University Policy 1.7
Research Related Conflicts of Interest and Commitment
Policy Introduction
All members of the Cornell University community are expected to conduct the affairs of the university in a manner consistent with their primary ethical, employment, and contractual commitments to the university. Further, the performance of their professional responsibilities must be free from real or apparent bias, motivated by self-interest. Relationships that may provide opportunity for bias must be disclosed and appropriately managed consistent with this Policy.
The university recognizes that the quality of teaching, research, extension service, and the administration of university programs may be enhanced when members of the Cornell University community participate in extramural activities. This Policy establishes the principles and requirements to assure that an individual’s primary and existing commitments to the university, and objectives that the conduct of research, performance of scholarship, and all other professional responsibilities are not unduly influenced or adversely affected by competing external commitments, or financial interests.
Bias is any tendency that may improperly influence the consideration of a question. In some cases, bias, or the appearance of bias, can be due to a Conflict of Interest (COI) arising when a member of the Cornell community has a financial interest (for example, in a startup company) that is relevant to their Cornell responsibilities. COI can be real in that a person can benefit financially, or possess the prospect of financial or other benefit, from biased actions or decisions influenced by competing interests. An external observer may also perceive a COI whether a real opportunity for benefit exists or not. Such situations must be managed properly to avoid any appearance of influence or bias in research, teaching, or other activities performed on behalf of the university. The appearance of COI, even if not actually present, can damage the reputation of the university and reduce the public trust in the reliability of Cornell's teaching and research.
Conflicts of Commitment (CoC) are implicated by competing demands on an individual’s time and effort external to Cornell; CoC can also include instances of divided loyalties that require both elevation and management. Academic appointees are required to cooperate and provide completely transparent information in any process for the elevation, review, and management of conflicts.
This policy defines the responsibilities and obligations of all personnel to ensure that all activities are conducted without bias or the appearance of bias, particularly due to a COI and CoC.
To Whom This Policy Applies
This policy applies to all members of the Cornell community and university appointees, including members of Cornell Tech and Weill Cornell Medicine (WCM), paid or unpaid who are in a position to influence the selection, funding, performance, administration, or conduct of university-related research or clinical activities.
Appointees who may be in a position to influence aspects of research include administrative, academic or nonacademic, full- or part-time, continuing or limited-term, staff such as, but not limited to, academic appointees with modified titles - visiting, courtesy, adjunct, etc. - clinical and affiliation appointments, and assistantship and fellowship appointments, e.g., research and teaching assistants, graduate research assistants, fellowship recipients, and training grant recipients.
1.0 Policy Principles
All individuals who are subject to this policy are expected to adhere to the following principles. The research, scholarship, and other professional activities of the university’s faculty, students, and staff are governed both by principles of academic freedom, balanced with individual and university responsibility, and by codes of academic integrity and ethical conduct. The principles included below protect academic freedoms, ensure open publication of research results, and encourage entrepreneurial activity. These principles require certain responsibilities. University personnel must behave in ways consistent with their principal loyalty and service to Cornell and the observance of legal and ethical requirements.
A. Cornell University’s Governing Principles regarding the Conduct of Research
- Academic freedom and open research: Cornell protects freedom of academic and research pursuits and the open publication, presentation, and open discourse of the results of Cornell scholarship and research.
- Ethics and Integrity: Cornell protects the integrity of the public research and scholarly records and the ethical conduct of all academic and research pursuits. Please refer to Policy 4.6, Standards of Ethical Conduct.)
- Nepotism: Family ties and personal relationships are not permitted to influence judgments on the quality of work or decisions on hiring, promotion, termination, or other terms or conditions of employment. Please refer to Policy 6.14, Avoiding Nepotism.
- Human Participant Research: Protecting the rights and welfare of human research participants in the conduct of research activity is of the utmost importance and required of all research personnel and the university.
- Confidentiality: The university is committed to maintaining the confidentiality of all information reported for the purposes of potential conflict disclosure or conflict resolution.
- Entrepreneurship: The university, within the limitations required to protect real and perceived conflicts, academic freedom, open research, integrity, and ethics, encourages and supports research personnel enhancing the impact of their research by entering into relationships with existing business entities or by starting their own.
B. Principles regarding the Primary Employment Obligations
- All employees, including those with academic appointments, are expected to evaluate and arrange their external interests and commitments to avoid compromising, or appearing to compromise, their ability to carry out their primary course and scope of duties and obligations to Cornell.
- Full-time employees, including those with academic appointments, have a primary commitment to the university and may only engage in external activities that are consistent with university requirements for external consulting and activity.
- Cornell employees may not supervise or assess individuals whom they employ or supervise in an external enterprise with which they have an interest, unless authorized by a written conflicts of interest management plan (CMP).
- Employees are expected to recognize the possibility that their external activities and commitments may influence or appear to influence their decision-making or the performance of their university obligations. These circumstances require the immediate disclosure and elevation of any such activities, without delay.
- Part-time employees, including those with academic appointments, may have concurrent obligations and commitments, not only to Cornell, but also to one or more external entities. The potential for conflicts of interest or commitment may be significant (i.e., divided loyalties, federal award disclosure obligations, and intellectual property disclosure / disposition conflicts). Accordingly, part-time employees are expected to exercise particular care in immediately reporting their concurrent obligations so they can be appropriately managed.
- All employees, whether full-time or part-time, are prohibited from participating in any Malign Foreign Government Talent Recruitment Program. Any questions can be directed to ORIA in Ithaca or the WCM Office of Research Integrity.
- The opportunity to conduct scholarship and research in a free and open environment is a privilege accorded by the university to its employees. To maintain the integrity of that environment, all employees have an obligation to:
- Maintain public and sponsor trust in the integrity of Cornell research and scholarship.
- Refrain from actions that may compromise Cornell’s not-for-profit status;
- Not exert undue or improper influence over direct reports, students or staff under their supervision;
- Comply with their continuing and primary employment obligations to Cornell and the principles and rules surrounding the conduct of research, as well as applicable federal rules, regulations and laws (e.g., conflicts, foreign influence disclosures, export controls, and anti-bribery and anti-corruptions prohibitions);
- Use Cornell facilities and resources in accordance with policy, law, and applicable regulations; and
- Maintain the integrity of U.S. government intellectual property rights, and Cornell assigned or developed intellectual property (IP) resulting from the conduct of research consistent with Policy 1.5 governing inventions, and 4.15 governing copyrighted content.
- On infrequent occasions, financial or other interests of the university itself introduce undue influence questions and the potential for an Institutional Conflict of Interest which requires university management. Please refer to Policy 4.14.
2.0 Responsibilities
2.1 Responsible Office(s)
The authority and responsibility for the disclosure, review and management of potential conflicts of any nature related to research resides in Cornell’s Research Conflicts Committee (RCC) and the Conflicts (of Interest) Management Offices staffed to support each Cornell campus. These committees, with the support of the Conflicts Management Office (CMO) and the Units of Cornell appointees, shall develop, maintain and document their respective operating procedures. The promulgated procedures shall include, but not be limited to: scope of authority; composition, position, roles and responsibilities; operating procedures; guidelines, if any; delegations of authority; Conflict Management Plan (CMP) development process and responsibility; enforcement authority; consequences of non-compliance; and appeals process (if any), following determinations.
Research Conflicts Committee (RCC)
- CMPs: The RCC, supported by the CMO, will:
- Gather and review information on conflicts as needed, devise appropriate plans to manage conflicts, communicate plans to research personnel, and monitor compliance with the plan.
- Ensure that all real or apparent conflicts related to research are identified and managed or, if unmanageable, terminated.
- Directly or through its delegates, review and respond to requests from research personnel to revise CMPs.
- Confidentiality: To the extent practicable and consistent with legal obligations, Cornell protects the confidentiality of information related to conflict matters and management plans. Information and materials provided to the RCC are shared to the most limited degree possible with those committee and staff members who are involved in the processing and review of reported information and the creation and implementation of CMPs, and others on a need-to-know basis.
- Non-compliance: The RCC monitors compliance with reporting and managing conflicts and investigates cases of non-compliance. In addition, it recommends sanctions to the Institutional Official for research personnel who have demonstrated disregard for this policy or RCC procedures. Sanctions may be recommended iteratively and progressively as determined by the RCC. Sanction recommendations may include a range of remedies including but not limited to, written notice to supervisors, denying eligibility for various research or innovation projects, and in especially egregious cases, dismissal from Cornell.
- Retrospective review and mitigation plans: In the event a conflict is not identified or managed in a timely manner, the RCC will review and implement a mitigation plan and notify any sponsoring agencies in accordance with that agency’s regulations.
2.2 University Management
General Counsel –
Appoints an attorney to serve as a non-voting member of the RCC and provide Committee support and subject-matter expertise.
Chief Research Compliance Officers (CRCOs)
- Provide regulatory, policy, and procedural expertise and administrative support to the RCC.
- Serve, or appoint a delegate to serve, as a non-voting member of the RCC.
- Provide staff to support RCC function.
Vice President for Research and Innovation and Provost for Medical Affairs and Dean of the Weill Cornell Medical College (WCMC) -
Responsible for policy implementation. All Cornell units are included under the same policy; some implementations may be campus-specific, college of appointment-specific, or relate specifically to clinical research at Weill Cornell Medicine.
Unit Head
Unit Heads are responsible for implementing this policy within their respective units, including preparing and managing conflicts management plans when applicable.
Institutional Official (IO)
- Appoints members of the RCC.
- Appeals: Receive and review appeals to RCC decisions from research personnel and make binding determinations. The IO may consult with the relevant Unit Head, Office of General Counsel, CRCO, or any other University official they deem appropriate.
Center for Technology Licensing (CTL)
- Appoint a representative to serve as a non-voting member of the Research Conflicts Committee (RCC) and provide subject-matter expertise.
- Inform RCC and research personnel of required conflict reporting related to licensing activity.
Institutional Review Board for Human Participants (IRB)
- Ensure the protection of human participants as subjects of research.
- Ensure that all required conflict review and management requirements are met prior to approving protocols.
- Add human participant protection measures to a CMP as may be needed.
- Note: The IRB is not empowered to change or delete other plan provisions required by the Research Compliance Committee.
Office of Sponsored Programs (OSP) and Office of Sponsored Research Administration (OSRA), Joint Clinical Trials Office (JCTO)
- Each appoint a representative to serve as a non-voting member of the RCC and provide subject-matter expertise.
- Ensure that all required RCC review and management requirements are met prior to submitting proposals and executing awards and other institutional agreements.
- Report to the CRCO, or delegate, violations of COI and Conflict of Commitment requirements in accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
2.3 Individuals
Personnel Possessing Conflicts Obligations Under START-UP NY; Launch NY; GROW NY; State Small Business Credit Initiatives; or any similar state and federal entrepreneurship funding initiatives supporting business startups and early-stage funding programs (Programs):
- Individuals in a position as an ‘official’, a ‘business insider’, or any Cornell employee in position to influence decision-making over such Programs shall comply with the applicable conflict rules and guidance governing Program implementation and conduct.
- No Cornell employee associated with such Programs shall violate conflict or other Program prohibitions for receipt of personal financial benefits in the operation of the Program, including but not limited to, private benefits, private inurement, and intermediate sanctions.
- Any Cornell employee associated with such Programs shall immediately report and disclose all prospective issues implicating the receipt of personal financial benefits by such employee (or Relative as defined by applicable guidance) arising from such association to permit review, evaluation and management of the prospective conflict.
While Cornell University is a participant in the START-UP NY program, Appendix A: START-UP NY Conflicts Guidelines, promulgated to comply with Section 439 of the New York State Economic Development Law and 5 NYCRR § 220.2 shall be effective. Appendix A is found at the end of this policy.
Researchers
Reporting - Report external relationships and interests fully, accurately, and promptly in accordance with the requirements set forth by this policy and procedures promulgated by the RCC. Report whenever:
- They are newly appointed to a role as research personnel by being hired by Cornell or by changing roles at Cornell;
- Their external relationships or those of their Family change;
- A year has passed since the last report.
- As required by regulations of sponsor grants on which they are supported.
External relationships for Family members must be reported only if the relationships are compensated and related to the reporter’s Cornell duties. Details of what and how to report are promulgated in procedures and guidelines by the RCC.
All research personnel are required to attest as part of each disclosure event that they are aware of and will comply with this policy and RCC procedures.
Training - Complete all training required by RCC procedures or requirements of sponsors for grants on which they are supported.
Right to appeal - All university research personnel have standing to appeal RCC decisions adversely affecting them to the Institutional Official.
Principal Investigator (PI) Identify all key research personnel on proposals and research, inform them of related conflict reporting requirements, and ensure that they submit conflict reports prior to proposal or protocol submission.
All individuals
Individuals are responsible for discharging their Cornell research duties in a manner that is free from real or apparent bias, motivated by self-interest and reporting and managing actual and apparent Conflicts of Interest and Conflicts of Commitment consistent with this policy.
All employees, officers, or governance trustees who may reasonably be assumed to be in a position to influence the outcome of research, scholarship, academic progress, or significant financial decisions are required to report fully, accurately, and in a timely manner, all external relationships and interests.
All individuals subject to this policy are required to report their external relationships fully, accurately, and in a timely manner, and to comply with all policies, procedures, and resulting CMPs, if any.
Any member of the Cornell University community may report known or suspected Conflicts of Interest or Conflicts of Commitment. The Cornell Ethics and Compliance Hotline is the primary mechanism to confidentially or anonymously report ethics, integrity, or compliance concerns to the University. Other reporting options are also available.
Malign Foreign Influence or Talent Programs - All Cornell employees must refrain from participation in malign foreign influence activities or foreign talent programs as defined by the U.S. government. Please refer to Cornell’s Research Security website for the most up to date information, including the current list of “foreign countries of concern.”
3.0 How to Report a Concern
The Cornell Ethics and Compliance Hotline is the primary mechanism to confidentially or anonymously report ethics, integrity, or compliance concerns to the University.
Other reporting options are also available.
4.0 Record Retention
Records associated with this policy, including documentation of all procedures developed to support the management and implementation of this Policy, shall be maintained by the individual or Unit responsible for the subject activity. Records shall be documented and retained, or properly disposed of, in accordance with University Policy 4.7, Retention of University Records.
5.0 Compliance
University Compliance, University Audit, and others may audit or investigate to assess compliance with this policy. Non-compliance with university policies is addressed in accordance with applicable policies and procedures and is subject to progressive disciplinary action up to and including termination.
7.0 Definitions
Term | Definition |
---|---|
Academic Staff Member |
Any instructional or research staff member listed in Article XVII, Section 1 of the Cornell University Bylaws (see Related Resources). |
Administration of Research |
Oversight, decision-making, or staff support of activities impacting research or research compliance that includes, but is not limited to, selection of vendors, determining the allocation of funds, negotiation with sponsors for the research project, protocol review and approval, compliance of research activities with regulations and Cornell policies, and managing resulting intellectual property and licensing opportunities. |
Board Member |
Any member of the Board of Trustees or the WCM Board of Fellows. |
Conflict Management |
Measures taken to address the risk of bias or the appearance of bias when members of the university community have real or apparent conflicts. |
Conflicts Management Office (CMO) |
Administrative staff under the CRCO that support the RCC. At the time of promulgation of this policy the CMO for Ithaca is the Office of Research Integrity and Assurance (ORIA) and for WCM is the Conflicts Management Office. |
Conflict Management Plan (CMP) |
Written plan detailing the measures to mitigate actual or perceived conflicts of interest or commitment for conflict management. |
Conflict of Commitment (CoC) |
A situation caused when an individual undertakes external commitments that may burden or interfere with their primary obligations and commitments to the university, even if the outside activity is valuable to the university or contributes to professional development. |
Conflict of Interest (COI) |
An actual, apparent, or potential conflict of interest may arise when the interests, activities, or relationships of any Cornell individual to whom this Policy applies compete with or are perceived to compete with the interests, activities, or concerns of the university such that the individual’s actions or decisions on behalf of the university, or related to the individual’s employment responsibilities, are compromised, or appear to be compromised. |
Cornell related research |
Research conducted with or enabled by the support of Cornell University resources beyond the usual computer and office resources available to all Cornell employees. |
Cornell Startup |
Any entity that is created to license Cornell-owned technology, is expected to or has licensed Cornell-owned technology or is founded predominately on the basis of Cornell-owned technology. |
Design, Purpose, Conduct, or Reporting of Research |
Oversight, decision-making, or participation in research that includes creating the structure, roles, and/or protocol of a research project; participating in the execution of the research roles and protocol; participating in the publishing, presentation, or discussion of the research results. |
Disclose/Disclosure |
To provide relevant information about an individual’s external commitments and interests to parties inside and outside the university to assure full awareness of potential conflicts and institutional efforts to address them. |
Domestic Partner |
A person who meets the university definition of domestic partner and whose partner has registered that relationship with the university in order to obtain benefits. |
External Commitment |
An obligation or activity (e.g., management, employment, advisory, or consulting role) that is not part of one’s primary commitments or obligations to the university. |
External Entity |
An entity other than the university or one of its units. |
Family Member |
An individual, and that individual’s spouse, domestic partner, parent, sibling, child, or any other blood relative, if that other blood relative resides in the same household. |
Human Participant Research |
Research involving a living individual about whom an investigator (whether professional or student) conducting the research obtains (1) data through intervention or interaction with the individual, or (2) identifiable private information. |
Individual |
Any employee, faculty, or governing board member of Cornell University. |
Institutional Conflict of Interest |
An Institutional COI occurs when the financial interests of Cornell have the potential to unduly influence institutional decision-making or compromise the integrity of the underlying decision(s) or transaction(s). |
Institutional/Cornell Responsibilities |
Activities that contribute to, arise out of, or are impacted by research, teaching, service, outreach, publications, professional/clinical practice, other scholarly pursuits or Cornell administrative duties, such as service on panels or committees. This includes consulting, lectureships, service on external panels or committees, expert witness testimonies, book promotions, etc. that are related to or arise from an area of Cornell expertise and activities. |
Interest |
Anything of value, whether or not the value is monetary or readily ascertainable. |
Intellectual Property (IP) |
Information created by or under the auspices of Cornell University including Patents, Copyrights, and other proprietary data, materials, assets, and technologies. |
Institutional Official (IO) |
Senior Leader responsible for research. Currently the Vice President for Research and Innovation is the IO for the Ithaca, NY; Geneva, NY; and Cornell Tech (Manhattan, NY) academic campuses, and the Provost for Medical Affairs is the IO for WCM campuses. |
Key Personnel |
Individuals responsible for the design, purpose, conduct, or reporting of a research study. For sponsored research: (1) principal investigators, co-investigators, and any other individual named in a sponsored project key personnel list; (2) anyone else who is independently responsible for the design, purpose, conduct and reporting of research, as determined by the principle investigator and any of the co-investigators on the research project; and (3) anyone who during the course of a sponsored project assumes a role synonymous with the roles above. For non-sponsored research: Those whose role on the research project is synonymous with the roles described above. For Institutional Review Board protocols: Principal investigators and co-investigators consistent with the procedures of each campus. |
Non-Sponsored University Research |
The pursuit of professional interests through research that is not supported by a sponsor. Non-Sponsored research includes, but is not limited to, research supported by an individual’s base salary, internal allocations, gifts, endowment income, fellowships, licensing income, and cost sharing. |
Report [Ithaca] / Conflicts Survey [WCMC] |
To provide information to the university concerning one’s external commitments and interests. Compare with Disclose. |
Report File |
Information submitted on a report, and any pertinent information gathered in relation to a report required for a complete review of external commitments and interests. |
Research |
A systematic investigation, including research development, testing, and evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge. (As defined in 45 CFR 46.102). |
Research Activities |
Any work or activity related to the design, purpose, conduct, reporting and Administration of Research. |
Research Conflicts Committee (RCC) |
The faculty committee empowered to create procedures for identifying conflicts related to research, approving Conflict Management Plans, and declaring conflicts unmanageable. Currently the WCM RCC is the Conflicts Assessment Panel (CAP), and the Ithaca RCC is the Financial Conflicts of Interest Committee (FCOIC). |
Research Personnel |
Any individual responsible for the design, purpose, conduct, or reporting of research, as well as any individual responsible for, or involved in, the Administration of Research. |
Research-Related |
An external commitment or interest that is likely to bias or appear to bias the outcome of research. |
Significant Financial Interest (SFI) |
The term “significant financial interest” (SFI), however, does not include the following types of financial interests:
|
Senior Leaders |
Any of the following:
Note: IRS and other regulations may require inclusion of “five highest compensated,” “key employees,” “interested persons,” “disqualified persons,” etc. |
Sponsor |
An external entity that funds or supports research. Sponsors include federal, state, and local governments and private entities, both non- profit and for profit. |
Sponsored Research |
Research funded by a sponsor through a grant, contract, or agreement. |
Undue Influence |
Undue influence occurs when an individual is able to persuade another's decisions due to the relationship between the two parties. Often, one of the parties is in a position of power over the other due to elevated status, higher education, or emotional ties. The more powerful individual uses this advantage to coerce the other individual into making decisions that might not be in their long-term best interest. |
Unit |
A college, research center, institute, program, business service center, office, or other operating entity of the university. |
Unit Head |
The dean, director or other leader of a unit and/or the campus Human Resource professional, who, individually or together shall be responsible for ensuring unit compliance with this policy, which may include supervising a Conflict Management Plan or drafting Conflict Management Plans for individuals who are not Research Personnel. In the event the chair, director or other leader is the subject of the concern at issue, that person’s immediate supervisor shall serve in their stead. |
8.0 Responsible Office and Policy Administration
Policy Clarification and Interpretation | Contact | Email/Web Address |
---|---|---|
Office of Research Integrity and Assurance | Conflicts of Interest Office | coi@cornell.edu |
Office of Research Integrity for Weill Cornell Medicine | WCM Office of Conflict of Interest | conflicts@med.cornell.edu |
9.0 Responsible Executive
Unit | Title |
---|---|
Responsible Executive | Vice President for Research and Innovation |
10.0 Revision History
Date Issued: | April 12, 2011 |
---|---|
Date of Full Review: | January 28, 2025 |
Date Last Updated: | January 30, 2025 |
Revision Notes: | Non-substantial revision: updated Section 8.0 Responsible Office. |
Appendix A
START-UP NY Conflicts Guidelines
As a participant in the START-UP NY Program (the “Program”), and pursuant to Section 439 of the New York State Economic Development Law and 5 NYCRR § 220.2, Cornell University adopts the following conflicts of interest guidelines with respect to the Program:
- Service as a university official shall not be used as a means for private benefit or inurement for such official, for any relative of such official, or any entity in which the official (or relative thereof) has a business interest.
- No official shall participate in any aspect of the Program that would result in such official experiencing an actual or potential conflict of interest. Without limiting the foregoing, no official (or relative of such official) may vote on or participate in the university’s administration of the Program with respect to any entity that employs such official in any capacity, or in which such official (or relative of such official) has a business interest.
- Upon becoming aware of an actual or potential conflict of interest related to the Program, an official shall advise the President or Executive Vice President and CFO of such official’s (or relative's) business interest in any such entity.
- The Vice President for Research and Innovation or designee shall maintain a written record of all disclosures of actual or potential conflicts of interest made pursuant to these STARTUP NY Conflicts Guidelines, and shall report such disclosures, on a calendar year basis and by January 31st of each year, to the University Auditor. The University Auditor shall forward such reports to the Commissioner of Empire State Development, who shall make public such reports.
- For purposes of these START-UP NY Conflicts Guidelines, the following definitions apply:
- An "official" means any Senior Leader, as well as any other employee with decision-making authority over the START-UP NY Program.
- An official has a “business interest” in an entity if the official (1) owns or controls 10% or more of the stock of the entity (or 1% in the case of an entity the stock of which is regularly traded on an established securities exchange); or (2) serves as an officer, director or partner of the entity.
- A "relative" of an official shall mean any person living in the same household as the official and any person who is a direct descendant of that official’s grandparents, or who is the spouse of such descendant.